Last week, an “Iron Man” game came out aligned with the theatrical release of the “Iron Man” movie.

The movie did fine despite “GTA IV” pulling in $500 million dollars, but not much has been said about the game (though it seems that people are renting it).

Would the “Iron Man” game have generated more buzz away from its movie release but also away from the release of “GTA IV”?

Other movie games planned for this summer are sticking with the standard practice of coming out with the film. The “Speed Racer“ movie and game are out this week, next week is “The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian” and later on this summer “Kung Fu Panda,” “The Incredible Hulk,” “Wall-E“… well, you get the idea. Summer blockbusters typically come with video games in tow.

However, this got us thinking about the new “Batman” movie. In summer 2005, “Batman Begins” had a game published by EA and developed by Eurocom that was released day and date with the film. Then the movie sequel “Dark Knight” was officially announced in August 2006 and hits theaters on July 18. Yet so far, we haven’t heard anything about a “Batman” game for July.

Last May, IGN reported a rumor that EA tapped Pandemic Studios to create a new Batman title based on the “Dark Knight” movie. Not much else was known. On April 2, 2008, IGN confirmed the rumor but the information was then immediately taken down. Multiplayer reached out to Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment, but representatives would not comment on the status of the game.

Also, “Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull,” which enters theaters on May 22 does not have a scheduled movie-based game. We asked Lucasarts why there isn’t a “Crystal Skull” game but received no response before press time. In 2005, an “Indiana Jones” game for next-gen consoles was announced, but no release date has been given. Meanwhile, “LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures” hits retail on June 3, but does not include the storyline from “Crystal Skull.”

Maybe the people behind the “Dark Knight” and the “Indiana Jones” games (as well as 2006’s “Superman Returns” game) know something we don’t.

Could licensed games benefit by not coming out day and date with the film?

Are movie-based games still relevant to gamers when the it comes out much later than the film, and perhaps tied to a DVD release?

Or does the game really miss out by not being released with the movie?

Last week I asked, “What’s the best age for someone to start playing video games?”

Some say seven is the right age, while others don’t think kids should play video games at all. Recently I interviewed two mothers about video games and their children; they each had different opinions. One mom didn’t allow consoles in her house, the other said games had a positive impact on her family.

This week, I spoke with two fathers on the subject. See why a gamer dad is uncomfortable with letting his kids see the pain inflicted in “Pain” and how “World of Warcraft” finally made another father put his foot down…

Carlo, 30 year-old creative director at an ad agency from Edison, NJ
Children: Two sons, ages 3 and 5
Systems Owned: VTech, Leapfrog Leapster, PC, DS, PSP, Wii, Xbox 360, PS3
Age OK for Kids to Play Games: Let kids play VTech at ages 2 and 4
Games Allowed to Play: E-rated games
Time Allowed: Up to 3 hours per weekday; more on weekends
Would Never Let Kids Play: “Shooting games with guns, explosions, limbs, blood;” “cartoony” violence

Read more…

What’s the best age for someone to start playing video games? That’s a question that’s been asked quite a bit lately.

Is it seven? According to educational psychologist Jane Healy, who spoke at the recent Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, children should be kept away from video games until the age of seven to “allow their brains to develop normally.”

The paperback edition of “How Computer Games Help Children Learn” by David Williamson Shaffer hit stores this week, basically explaining how video games can be good for children. We’ve also heard firsthand accounts from people — video game legends, even — who began playing games at an early age, and they seemed to turn out pretty normal (or in some cases, brilliant).

In light of all this, I wondered what actual parents thought. We know what a lot of children’s specialists, media watchdog groups and industry researchers think. I decided to ask some parents I knew (and parents that friends and co-workers knew) about their opinions on the subject.

First up, I spoke with two mothers with very different answers.

Who: Alisa, 38 year-old business owner from Boston, MA
Children: Two daughters, ages 6 and 9
Systems Owned: LeapFrog, Mac computer
Age OK for Kids to Play Games: Let her daughter play LeapFrog at age 4, but only web games since
Games Allowed to Play: Pre-approved web games only
Time Allowed: 30 minutes, several times a week
Would Never Let Kids Play: Any violent games or games that let you “beat up or say crude things to a woman”

Read more…

As a general rule, I tend to save all my vacation days until the end of the year.

Whether this is just out of fear or being out of the office during the rest of the year, or just general procrastination, it is paying off a bit in terms of my Achievements quest.

This past week I was able to rack up 1,555 points putting my overall score at 14,350.

This leaves me with 5,650 points to go before I reach my goal of 20,000 points before “Super Smash Bros. Brawl” is released in early February.

With the next few weeks freed up due to the holidays, vacation time, and not having to write this column again until after the new year, I’m fairly confident I can pull it off.

I played a mixed bag of games this week for my quest.

Read more…