Posted 2/15/12
Posted 2/15/12
Posted 2/15/12
Posted 2/15/12
Posted 2/15/12
Posted 5/27/08 3:00 pm ET by Stephen Totilo in Game Reviewing, Reviews Week, Top Entries

About a month ago I started interviewing people in the gaming industry about reviews. I'd read plenty of rants about the state of game reviews. But I wanted to know more. I wanted to do some reporting.
I wanted to ask some big questions:
I asked a lot more than that. And I found out plenty of information which I'll be sharing all week. Read on for a schedule of the posts to come and some initial findings.
I conducted a dozen in-depth interviews with developers, publishers, p.r. people and reviewers. Off the record, I spoke to dozens more. I wanted to talk to retailers too, but so far none will speak to me. As for gamers themselves, I hope these posts will get them talking.
I learned a lot.
I learned that many developers are deeply suspicious of the qualifications of many game reviewers.
I learned about a controversial industry practice that has caused bad reviews to literally keep food off developers' tables.
I learned that Jeff Gerstmann was going to give the PC version of "Kane & Lynch" a lower score than he did the console one.
And I learned what changes, if any, some of the top game creators and bloggers want to make to the reviews process.
So here's the schedule for the week. You can expect a week dedicated to exploring the ins and outs of how reviews work why they really matter and who influences them. Arm yourself with knowledge and check out some more game review reporting.
MTV Multiplayer Reviews Week (Tentative) Schedule
Posted 2/2/12
Posted 12/21/11
Posted 12/10/11
Comments